To Everyone. Good afternoon. Please read and inwardly digest the following.

Parts of the network, and we are predominately interested in “our” part of the network, is now being courted to another network which, in our view, is well and truly ridiculous.

Such nonsensical schemes are aimed at attracting strapped-for-cash ‘impressionables’, constantly looking for that ever illusive greener grass. The scheme currently being tarted around must surely be a delight - you don’t actually have to work for your money – you play! Wouldn’t we all like to do that?

And for those who prefer to remain in their absurd comfort zone of “can’t be bothered to put in a bit of graft for my crusts”, their apparent inability to appreciate value is further appeased as they are not required to come up with a joining fee – well not yet anyway.

That fee, £199.97, for your “virtual business kit and back office functionality” (heavens, such impressive nomenclature!) is to be paid when the scheme is up and running. Then, you will be also required to pay a monthly “licence” fee of £65. Don’t worry however, this is “covered” by a bonus called the “power pool revenue share” based on a percentage(?) of the net (?)revenue collected by the scheme, pooled into a fund and shared out – but capped (of course) at £65.

In the words of ‘Who Wants to be a Millionaire’ –“Oh no, we’re not going to give you that.” that is unless “just three participants in your team become “active” in three separate legs, one of which was personally sponsored by you.”

We do so understand that we are not being very helpful to you all here, because we cannot find it in the literature, at what point in the accounting year that net revenue figure , whatever that may be, is calculated for purposes of date of share out –but perhaps those members of our team who are presently touting this dubious enterprise among their teams and Kleeneze customers, would let us all know. Again, at further risk of being seen to be so unhelpful to you all, such a sad state of affairs for any SED - we do not quite grasp the full meaning of the word “ active” either.

However, it seems to be, though we are not absolutely sure, that the monthly “licence fee” is so called because the games are associated with gambling, which, and we quote the delicate phrasing of that Millionaire with his own inimitable style - G. Scott - “can be played for bugger-all on Yahoo and Google for goodness sake!”

If you think that the joining fee is steep, then think again. You can actually get this back too “thanks to the fast start bonus.”! Well folks, let’s thank our lucky stars for that Fast Start Bonus – we can all get our money back and more – we can play gambling games on our computers all day long and get paid for it! That’s cool. That’s mint! All you have to do is personally sponsor other people who qualify as “active’ within 28 days, then you get “£100 each time”! There goes that “active” word again – does it mean “active” in the sense you can chase a mouse round the mat on your computer table and play poker at the same time. That’s not active, that’s hard work!

Here is a line from the literature which tickled us. “ Is this going to be really complicated and over my head? Will it involve loads of hard work? And the answer –

“Yes if you had to do it on your own. However we have made a 7 figure investment and removed the barriers for you to become involved” . How generous!

However, Mel I will not be taking advantage of the scheme’s fabulous 7 figure generosity. Nor will we receive the “social networking and marketing tool that is ready to use immediately”. What a loss!!

No, we much prefer to adhere to our word, and the signature we gave on our contract with Kleeneze that we would not, being above Gold, become involved with any other network whilst with Kleeneze.

That is our commitment to the company, to ourselves and to all those members of our team who are clearly building their businesses with a real opportunity, many of whom truly deserve to be helped and guided towards achieving massive success. No, as trainee leaders, (and it is not always such an easy role) we prefer to attach, and be seen to attach great value to our personal credibility amongst you all and not so readily throw away such a valuable attribute on any hare-brained worthless schemes.

How the Company will deal with such issues as non-compliant Gold Distributors and above, is a matter for them.

Irene Wilson